Everyone riveted to the TV screen while waiting for extra judicial killings witness, Edgar Matobato to spill the beans. The plot thickens as the truth unfolds (or so we thought). Everyone one in the senate took turns of throwing questions to determine Matobato's credibility. Of course, those who are glued to their TV screen were just waiting for the witness to open a can of worms. There is currently a web of controversies rippling around war on drugs, and it is no secret that some members of the senate are also doing their own investigation. The investigation involves digging deeper into the proliferation of Extra Judicial Killings under the Duterte regime.

Matobato reiterated everything he knew about the extra judicial killings in vivid details. However, it appeared that the more he opened his mouth, the more he got himself into trouble. People who watched the senate hearing took to social media to express their disappointment, dismay and a bit of appreciation for Matobato's chutzpah. Yes, there were mixed reactions about the issue, but most of which are negative. 

Due to the series of inconsistencies on Matobato's statement, Senator Panfilo Lacson could not help but question the alleged Davao Death Squad member's credibility. The question is, are there necessary steps that supposed witnesses have to take to determine their credibility?

C. TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE

1. Qualification of Witnesses

Section 20.    Witnesses; their qualifications. — Except as provided in the next succeeding section, all persons who can perceive, and perceiving, can make their known perception to others, may be witnesses.

Religious or political belief, interest in the outcome of the case, or conviction of a crime unless otherwise provided by law, shall not be ground for disqualification. (18a)

Section 21.    Disqualification by reason of mental incapacity or immaturity. — The following persons cannot be witnesses:

(a) Those whose mental condition, at the time of their production for examination, is such that they are incapable of intelligently making known their perception to others;

(b) Children whose mental maturity is such as to render them incapable of perceiving the facts respecting which they are examined and of relating them truthfully. (19a)

Section 22.    Disqualification by reason of marriage. — During their marriage, neither the husband nor the wife may testify for or against the other without the consent of the affected spouse, except in a civil case by one against the other, or in a criminal case for a crime committed by one against the other or the latter's direct descendants or ascendants. (20a)

Section 23.    Disqualification by reason of death or insanity of adverse party. — Parties or assignor of parties to a case, or persons in whose behalf a case is prosecuted, against an executor or administrator or other representative of a deceased person, or against a person of unsound mind, upon a claim or demand against the estate of such deceased person or against such person of unsound mind, cannot testify as to any matter of fact occurring before the death of such deceased person or before such person became of unsound mind. (20a)

Section 24.    Disqualification by reason of privileged communication. — The following persons cannot testify as to matters learned in confidence in the following cases:

(a) The husband or the wife, during or after the marriage, cannot be examined without the consent of the other as to any communication received in confidence by one from the other during the marriage except in a civil case by one against the other, or in a criminal case for a crime committed by one against the other or the latter's direct descendants or ascendants;

(b) An attorney cannot, without the consent of his client, be examined as to any communication made by the client to him, or his advice given thereon in the course of, or with a view to, professional employment, nor can an attorney's secretary, stenographer, or clerk be examined, without the consent of the client and his employer, concerning any fact the knowledge of which has been acquired in such capacity;

(c) A person authorized to practice medicine, surgery or obstetrics cannot in a civil case, without the consent of the patient, be examined as to any advice or treatment given by him or any information which he may have acquired in attending such patient in a professional capacity, which information was necessary to enable him to act in capacity, and which would blacken the reputation of the patient;

(d) A minister or priest cannot, without the consent of the person making the confession, be examined as to any confession made to or any advice given by him in his professional character in the course of discipline enjoined by the church to which the minister or priest belongs;

(e) A public officer cannot be examined during his term of office or afterwards, as to communications made to him in official confidence, when the court finds that the public interest would suffer by the disclosure. (21a)

The inherited estate is one of the most talked about topics concerning property relation. While it is often said that when two people get married, anything acquired during marriage is deemed conjugal property, there are still some exceptions to the rule and this is where issues become complex. What if the property at the time of marriage has been inherited by one of the spouses? This is an interesting question because the problem usually arises when couples decide to call it quits due to irreconcilable differences. As a result, all of the properties acquired will be divided equally. What makes a property exclusive?

Section 2. Exclusive Property of Each Spouse

"Art. 109. The following shall be the exclusive property of each spouse:

    (1) That which is brought to the marriage as his or her own;

    (2) That which each acquires during the marriage by gratuitous title;

    (3) That which is acquired by right of redemption, by barter or by exchange with property belonging to only one of the spouses; and

    (4) That which is purchased with exclusive money of the wife or of the husband. (148a)

Art. 110. The spouses retain the ownership, possession, administration and enjoyment of their exclusive properties.

Either spouse may, during the marriage, transfer the administration of his or her exclusive property to the other by means of a public instrument, which shall be recorded in the registry of property of the place the property is located. (137a, 168a, 169a)

Art. 111. A spouse of age may mortgage, encumber, alienate or otherwise dispose of his or her exclusive property, without the consent of the other spouse, and appear alone in court to litigate with regard to the same. (n)

Art. 112. The alienation of any exclusive property of a spouse administered by the other automatically terminates the administration over such property and the proceeds of the alienation shall be turned over to the owner-spouse. (n)

Art. 113. Property donated or left by will to the spouses, jointly and with designation of determinate shares, shall pertain to the donee-spouses as his or her own exclusive property, and in the absence of designation, share and share alike, without prejudice to the right of accretion when proper. (150a)

Art. 114. If the donations are onerous, the amount of the charges shall be borne by the exclusive property of the donee spouse, whenever they have been advanced by the conjugal partnership of gains. (151a)

Art. 115. Retirement benefits, pensions, annuities, gratuities, usufructs and similar benefits shall be governed by the rules on gratuitous or onerous acquisitions as may be proper in each case. (n)"

Have you ever basked in the solace of beer or dangerous drugs? Have you been on a downward spiral toward depression that you consider these substances as a quick but temporary fix? Is having fun incomplete without drowning yourself in these substances? When you are under the influence of alcohol or dangerous drugs, you do things you do not normally do as inhibitions are unleashed. When you no longer know where to draw the line, it seems so easy to flirt with danger and even go steady with death. Intoxication can breed danger or pose a threat to your life and to other people. Drinking should not be intertwined with driving. Here's why:

Implementing Rules And Regulations

"REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10586
AN ACT PENALIZING PERSONS DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL, DANGEROUS DRUGS, AND SIMILAR SUBSTANCES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
SEC. 4. Driver’s Education. – Every applicant for a motor vehicle driver’s license shall complete a course of instruction that provides information on safe driving including, but not limited to, the effects of the consumption of alcoholic beverages on the ability of a person to operate a motor vehicle, the hazards of driving under the influence of alcohol, dangerous drugs and/or other similar substances, and the penalties attached for violation thereof.

For professional drivers, every applicant for a driver’s license or those applying for renewal thereof shall undergo the driver’s education herein stated.

The driver’s license written examination shall include questions concerning the effects of alcohol and drug intoxication on the ability of a person to operate a motor vehicle and the legal and pecuniary consequences resulting from violation of the provisions of this Act.

SEC. 5. Punishable Act. – It shall be unlawful for any person to drive a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, dangerous drugs and/or other similar substances.

SEC. 6. Conduct of Field Sobriety, Chemical and Confirmatory Tests. – A law enforcement officer who has probable cause to believe that a person is driving under the influence of alcohol, dangerous drugs and/or other similar substances by apparent indications and manifestations, including overspeeding, weaving, lane straddling, sudden stops, swerving, poor coordination or the evident smell of alcohol in a person’s breath or signs of use of dangerous drugs and other similar substances, shall conduct field sobriety tests.

If the driver fails in the sobriety tests, it shall be the duty of the law enforcement officer to implement the mandatory determination of the driver’s blood alcohol concentration level through the use of a breath analyzer or similar measuring instrument.

If the law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that a person is driving under the influence of dangerous drugs and/or other similar substances, it shall be the duty of the law enforcement officer to bring the driver to the nearest police station to be subjected to a drug screening test and, if necessary, a drug confirmatory test as mandated under Republic Act No. 9165.

Law enforcement officers and deputized local traffic enforcement officers shall be responsible in implementing this section.

SEC. 7. Mandatory Alcohol and Chemical Testing of Drivers Involved in Motor Vehicular Accidents. – A driver of a motor vehicle involved in a vehicular accident resulting in the loss of human life or physical injuries shall be subjected to chemical tests, including a drug screening test and, if necessary, a drug confirmatory test as mandated under Republic Act No. 9165, to determine the presence and/or concentration of alcohol, dangerous drugs and/or similar substances in the bloodstream or body.

SEC. 8. Refusal to Subject Oneself to Mandatory Tests. – A driver of a motor vehicle who refuses to undergo the mandatory field sobriety and drug tests under Sections 6, 7 and 15 of this Act shall be penalized by the confiscation and automatic revocation of his or her driver’s license, in addition to other penalties provided herein and/or other pertinent laws."

The husband and wife may decide to call it quits because a spark of romance no longer ignites their relationship. Sometimes, married couples stay together because of their children. When the time comes that they cannot stand each other, separation is the only option worth-exploring. By separation means being physically separated without going through any judicial process. After a long period of physical separation, both parties may decide to find somebody new and start all over again.

The common misconception of separated husband and wife is that long separation automatically nullifies marriage. This is not true at all. Even if you have separated for more than 10 years, it does not deny the fact that your marriage is still valid. Death and judicial process are the options that can declare your marriage null and void.

Preparing and notarizing a document that declare both parties free to marry other individuals may be an alternative to the judicial process that married couples need to undergo. The document is also a proof that they will not file charges of concubinage or adultery against each other. Are these documents enough to nullify marriage or allow both parties to remarry?

Illegal, Immoral, Void

Since 1933, the Supreme Court has ruled that these documents are considered illegal, immoral and void. This rule has been in existence for 83 years. If ever judges, lawyers and notaries-public have prepared and signed this kind of document, they will be reprimanded by the Court. Penalties such as suspension or disbarment will be imposed. Unfortunately, these practices still exist.

These documents will not vindicate both parties in the event they commit a crime of adultery or concubinage. According to Article 221, Civil code, "any contract for personal separation between husband and wife and every extra judicial agreement, during the marriage, for the dissolution of the conjugal partnership" will be considered void by the law to preserve the institutions of the family and marriage. Even a notarized document will be not be considered as a way of facilitating the disintegration of a marriage nor will it encourage the separation of spouses.

For anyone who may attempt to use a notarized document for the belief that it is enough to remarry someone just because it has been notarized by a lawyer or a judge, you need to think again. You can run from the law, but you can never hide. Since the process involved in filing for nullity of marriage is long and expensive, an attempt to reconcile is still deemed necessary.

When it comes to complying with job requirements, processing a passport or obtaining other essential documents,you need to provide additional documents, which can only be obtained from public or government offices. The lines can be longer than your patience especially if you have waited for hours to get the documents or IDs you have requested. If waiting in line for hours is also your pet peeve, the Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007 is going to be the answer to the time-consuming process involved in processing documents.

Republic Act No. 9485 (Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007)

SEC. 2. Declaration of Policy. - It is hereby declared the policy of the State to promote integrity, accountability, proper management of public affairs and public property as well as to establish effective practices aimed at the prevention of graft and corruption in government. Towards this end, the State shall maintain honesty and responsibility among its public officials and employees, and shall take appropriate measures to promote transparency in each agency with regard to the manner of transacting with the public, which shall encompass a program for the adoption of simplified procedures that will reduce red tape and expedite transactions in government.

SEC. 3. Coverage. - This Act shall apply to all government offices and agencies including local government units and government-owned or -controlled corporations that provide frontline services as defined in this Act. Those performing judicial, quasi-judicial and legislative functions are excluded from the coverage of this Act.

Simple Versus Complex Transactions

Simple transactions refer to applications or requests submitted by clients of an agency or government office. These transactions only require ministerial actions on the part of employee or public officer. On the other hand, complex transactions refer to applications or requests by clients of a government office which require the use of discretion in resolving complicated issues by an employee or officer of an agency or government office.

Penalties

"SEC. 11. Violations. - After compliance with the substantive and procedural due process, the following shall constitute violations of this Act together with their corresponding penalties:

(a) Light Offense -

    (1) Refusal to accept application and/or request within the prescribed period or any document being submitted by a client;

    (2) Failure to act on an application and/or request or failure to refer back to the client a request which cannot be acted upon due to lack of requirement/s within the prescribed period;

    (3) Failure to attend to clients who are within the premises of the office or agency concerned prior to the end of official working hours and during lunch

    (4) Failure to render frontline services within the prescribed period on any application and/or request without due cause;

    (5) Failure to give the client a written notice on the disapproval of an application or request; and

    (6) Imposition of additional irrelevant requirements other than those listed in the first notice.

Penalties for light offense shall be as follows:

    First Offense - Thirty (30) days suspension without pay and mandatory attendance in Values Orientation Program;

    Second Offense - Three (3) months suspension without pay; and

    Third Offense - Dismissal and perpetual disqualification from public service.

(b) Grave Offense - Fixing and/or collusion with fixers in consideration of economic and/or other gain or advantage.

Penalty - Dismissal and perpetual disqualification from public service."

Fixers

They are visible whenever there are applicants who are waiting in vain for their IDs or other government documents to be released. They promise a faster and better transaction in exchange for cash. More often than not, fixers would ask more than what the applicant needs to pay for the document or ID. Since it takes hours or even days for the requested documents to be released, the applicant will be left with no choice but to give in to the fixer's demands.

"SEC. 12. Criminal Liability for Fixers. - In addition to Sec. 11 (b), fixers, as defined in this Act, shall suffer the penalty of imprisonment not exceeding six years or a fine not less than Twenty Thousand Pesos (P20,000.00) but not more than Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (P200,000.00) or both fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the court.

They say, "stick and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me". Words can hurt people and can scar them for life. When a person becomes a victim to the throes of another person's anger, hurtful words become a powerful weapon that pierces through the soul. Some would simply shrug these off, but if words have already tainted one's reputation, honor or character, the matters are taken to court. Libel, oral defamation or slander. These are freedom of speech and expression gone wrong. As they say, too much of everything is bad and even if you only intend to express your anger, discontentment or turmoil towards the person by uttering or writing unpleasant words against him or her, the damage cannot be undone. However, deciphering the intricacies of laws concerning violation of freedom of speech and expression can be quite puzzling. So, how does libel differ from slander?

Libel

Libel, according the to Article 353 of the Revised Penal Code is "the public and malicious imputation of a crime, or  of a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status, or circumstance tending to cause the dishonor, discredit, or contempt of a natural or juridical person, or to blacken the memory of one who is dead"

"ART. 355. Libel by means of writings or similar means. — A libel committed by means of writing, printing, lithography, engraving, radio, phonograph, painting, theatrical exhibition, cinematographic exhibition, or any similar means, shall be punished by prisión correccional in its minimum and medium periods or a fine ranging from 200 to 6,000 pesos, or both, in addition to the civil action which may be brought by the offended party."

Slander or Oral Defamation

Slander or oral defamation is defined as speaking of base or defamatory words with an intention to prejudice another person in his or her reputation. Slander by deed on the other hand, is an act committed which tends to discredit or dishonor another individual. (Article 359 of the Revised Penal Code)

Art. 358. Slander. — Oral defamation shall be punished by arresto mayor in its maximum period to prision correccional in its minimum period if it is of a serious and insulting nature; otherwise the penalty shall be arresto menor or a fine not exceeding 200 pesos.

Art. 359. Slander by deed. — The penalty of arresto mayor in its maximum period to prision correccional in its minimum period or a fine ranging from 200 to 1,000 pesos shall be imposed upon any person who shall perform any act not included and punished in this title, which shall cast dishonor, discredit or contempt upon another person. If said act is not of a serious nature, the penalty shall be arresto menor or a fine not exceeding 200 pesos.

Whether it is spoken or written, it is every person's responsibility to mince words to avoid hurting another person's feelings. It is true that the freedom of speech and expression is one of the most valued rights, but this does not give you license to say as you please.

Renting a property is indeed very challenging especially when it comes to following rules. Due to excitement, the tenant may immediately sign the contract without reading the content of the tenancy agreement. It is important to ask questions before you consider signing the lease agreement to prevent problems from arising in the future.

1. Mode of payment

Before you sign the lease agreement, be sure you find out about the mode of payment accepted. More often than not, the landlord will prefer cash but check or bank transfer may also be an option. Aside from the mode of payment, you should also ask about the specific date that the payment should be made.

2. Utilities you are responsible for

Some landlords include utilities like water and electricity to the rental payment while others may also consider paying the utilities separately. Make sure you settle issues of utilities so confusion can be avoided.

3. Repair and Renovation of the Property

It is important to know whether or not it is allowed to make changes to the property. Some landlords allow repair and renovation while others may not agree with it. The landlord's policy regarding re-designing the rental space is usually specified on the contract.

4. Guest Policy

You have to keep in mind that the policy when renting an apartment or other types of rental property may vary from landlord to landlord. There are landlords who prefer to set specific visiting hours and prohibit tenants from accepting visitors in the middle of the night due to security issues. Before you move in, ask the time you can accept or bring a guest.

5. Bringing Pets

Again, some landlords do not mind bringing your furry friends, but there are owners that either prohibit pets in the property or expect a pet deposit. Ask in advance to find out.

6. Maintenance Problem

It can be inevitable to encounter maintenance emergency when you are supposed to have a good night's sleep. The landlord must be quick to respond to maintenance problems. You should know if the landlord has a reliable repairman who will come to the rescue in case of maintenance emergency.

7. Damage and Security Deposit

The security deposit serves as your bond in the event you have incurred damage in the property. However, if you choose to not renew your contract and there are no damages in the property, you need to get a refund of your security deposit. Ask the landlord if they allow documenting current damage in the rental property for future reference.

8.Non-Refundable Security Deposit

Normal wear and tear can be an issue that may cause the landlord to hold the deposit. Be sure to arm yourself with sufficient knowledge about the reasons for not getting your security deposit back.

It is a known fact that some properties for sale are still registered in the names of the deceased parent or next of kin. If the property owner passed away, the estate must be settled before the name of the buyer can be transferred. More often than not, this is a complicated process if you do not know the steps. When you settle the estate of a deceased person, it means you should declare the properties of the deceased whether it is real or personal estate. The name of another person cannot be successfully transferred if the estate has not been settled. The rule applies to both testate and intestate.

6 Steps To Settling The Estate Of A Deceased Person

1. Secure and fill out BIR Form 1904. The form is intended for application for registration. It is important to apply for a valid Tax Identification Number (TIN) when you transact with the BIR. The purpose of Form 1904 is to verify the seller's and the buyer's TIN. When it comes to the payment of estate taxes, it is important to secure a separate TIN for the estate of the deceased. 

2. Prepare the mandatory documentary requirements and submit them to the BIR so the estate of a deceased person will be settled.

3. Secure BIR Form 1801. This form refers to the Estate Tax Return Form. Fill out the form with the necessary information such as the name and the TIN of the Estate. The ONETT officer of the Day will help you in filling out the rest of the form based on the computation and review of the documents you have presented. You will need to consult a certified public accountant if the estate of the deceased person is more than P3 million. The accountant will help to determine the taxable estate's initial computation.

4. Pay the estate tax based on the computation. Settle the estate tax with an Authorized Agent Bank (AAB) of the RDO, which has the jurisdiction over the place of residence of the deceased person. You can pay the computed estate tax by cash, manager's or cashier's check. If you are going to settle the estate tax through a Manager's or Cashier's Check, make sure that the following is written as payee:" (Bank, Branch) FAO BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE IFO (Taxpayer's Name) (Tin of Taxpayer)." If you choose to pay the estate tax using a AAB, which is a government financial institution such as Landbank of the Philippines, the payee will be the BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

5. The documentary requirements must be submitted including the proof of payment to the RDO, which has the jurisdiction over the decedent's place of residence.

6. Wait for the Certificate Authorizing Registration to be released. Once CAR is released, the property can be sold to a buyer. When paying the capital gains, the CAR along with Affidavit of Self-Adjudication, Extra-judicial Settlement of Estate, Tax Clearance Certificate and other requirements should presented.

Have you ever encountered a person who demands you to give up money or other property by intimidation, threat of violence or damage to your reputation? Extortion involves force and even if the victim has given his or her consent, that consent has been obtained illegally. Extortion comes is many forms. A classic example would be the protection scheme. This involves demanding store owners to pay a certain amount for protection to prevent the extortionist from creating any damage to the store owner's property.

The laglag bala scheme is also an example of extortion. Some people who were caught carrying bullets were asked to pay the airport authorities in exchange of their freedom. Some laglag bala victims chose to pay to spare themselves from the long investigation process.  In extortion, there is a threat of violence involved and it leaves victims with no other choice but to comply to avoid any inconvenience and disturbance.

Section 9. Article 294 of the same Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Art. 294. Robbery with violence against or intimidation of persons 

Penalties. Any person guilty of robbery with the use of violence against or intimidation of any person shall suffer:

1. The penalty of reclusion perpetua to death, when by reason or on occasion of the robbery, the crime of homicide shall have been committed, or when the robbery shall have been accompanied by rape or intentional mutilation or arson.

2. The penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium period to reclusion perpetua, when or if by reason or on occasion of such robbery, any of the physical injuries penalized in subdivision I of Article 263 shall have been inflicted.

3. The penalty of reclusion temporal, when by reason or on occasion of the robbery, any of the physical injuries penalized in subdivision 2 of the article mentioned in the next preceding paragraph, shall have been inflicted.

4. The penalty of prision mayor in its maximum period to reclusion temporal in its medium period, if the violence or intimidation employed in the commission of the robbery shall have been carried to a degree clearly unnecessary for the commission of the crime, or when in the course of its execution, the offender shall have inflicted upon any person not responsible for its commission any of the physical injuries covered by subdivisions 3 and 4 of said Article 263.

5. The penalty of prision correccional in its maximum period to prision mayor in its medium period in other cases.

Anyone can be a victim of extortion and if you feel that your rights have been violated, you need to seek help from an attorney.

Immediate resignation is prevalent in most companies. While employees may terminate their contract of employment through resignation, a written notice of the resignation must be given in advance. The written notice is counted as 30 calendar days. The purpose of the advance notice is to prevent disrupting the business operation and to protect the employee from being held liable for damages.

This is a common scenario especially when employees no longer feel motivated to work. The decision to resign just comes out of the blue. However, there are some risks involved in tendering an immediate resignation.

What happens if you do not provide resignation notice?

There are certain measures that will be implemented in the event you do not comply with the required notice period. It can have a serious impact on you as an employee because you have not ensured proper transition. Complying with the required notice period means giving the company enough time to find your replacement.

When can an employee resign without serving any notice?

Under Article 285 of the Labor Code, the following circumstances may allow an employee to terminate the contract of employment without serving a written notice.

1. Serious insult by the employer or his representative on the honor and person of the employee;

2. Inhuman and unbearable treatment accorded the employee by the employer or his representative;

3. Commission of a crime or offense by the employer or his representative against the person of the employee or any of the immediate members of his family; and

4.Other causes analogous to any of the foregoing.

Separation Pay

If an employee voluntarily resigns from work, he or she may not be entitled to separation pay. However, separation pay will only be given if the severance of employment is beyond the employee's control. For instance, an employer decides to retrench worker to prevent losses and this will force the employee to resign or depart from the company. Under the law, dismissed employee is entitled to separation pay.

Voluntary resignation where severance of employment is the employee's initiative, the law does not require the employer to give separation pay. However, there can still be some exceptions to the rule.

1. When payment of separation pay is stipulated in the employment contract or Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA, for companies with existing bargaining agent or union);

2. When it is sanctioned by established employer practice or policy.

One of the most controversial cases that is currently undergoing further investigation is the case of two arrested suspects for illegal drug possession who were killed by Pasay City cops. The suspects for the possession of illegal drugs were Renato Bertes and Jaypee Bertes, residents of Ignacio Street in Pasay City. According to the investigation, only one handcuff was used for restraining two drug suspects. Things went out of hand upon their return to the detention cell. When PO2 Alipio Balo was removing the handcuff, Renato attempted to grab the gun. Balo was able to take control of the gun and shot Renato while PO1 Michael Tomas shot Jaypee.

Murder charges were filed against two policemen involved in the killing of the drug suspects. Although the investigation held on August 22, covered other cases of extra judicial killing, the case of the two policemen were the first to undergo scrutiny. Senior Supt. Nolasco Bathan was in the hot seat as Senator Leila de Lima, chair of justice and human rights committee asked for the basis of filing the murder case. Bathan was not able to give a clear answer, leading De Lima to probe more. Bathan said that the murder charges were filed because someone got killed. De Lima wanted to know why file murder charges instead of homicide. What is the difference between homicide and murder?

Premeditation

Premeditation refers to the action of planning something beforehand. This means that the killer has already made a decision to kill or thought about killing another person. This may require meticulous planning to make the killing appear to be an accident.

"Art. 248. Murder. — Any person who, not falling within the provisions of Article 246 shall kill another, shall be guilty of murder and shall be punished by reclusion temporal in its maximum period to death, if committed with any of the following attendant circumstances:

1. With treachery, taking advantage of superior strength, with the aid of armed men, or employing means to weaken the defense or of means or persons to insure or afford impunity.

2. In consideration of a price, reward, or promise.

3. By means of inundation, fire, poison, explosion, shipwreck, stranding of a vessel, derailment or assault upon a street car or locomotive, fall of an airship, by means of motor vehicles, or with the use of any other means involving great waste and ruin.

4. On occasion of any of the calamities enumerated in the preceding paragraph, or of an earthquake, eruption of a volcano, destructive cyclone, epidemic or other public calamity.

5. With evident premeditation.

6. With cruelty, by deliberately and inhumanly augmenting the suffering of the victim, or outraging or scoffing at his person or corpse.

Art. 249. Homicide. — Any person who, not falling within the provisions of Article 246, shall kill another without the attendance of any of the circumstances enumerated in the next preceding article, shall be deemed guilty of homicide and be punished by reclusion temporal."

Child support is an issue that needs more work because there are still parents who do not take the law seriously by deliberately refusing to give legal support to children despite the court order. Rep. Rosenda Ann Ocampo has recently filed the bill that criminalizes fathers who fail or refuse to provide legal child support without justifiable cause. If this bill is passed, single mothers who have suffered enough for years raising their children will receive the support intended to them.

At present, the country has Republic Act 9262 otherwise known as the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act of 2004. In the current law the parent should remit the support to the parent who has the parental authority or legal custody over the child. However, there are still parents who refuse to give legal child support. If the bill will be passed, parents who are unable to provide support for a period of more than six months will be penalized. Any parent who pays less than the agreed amount will also be penalized.

According to the proposed bill, a penalty of P25,000 or imprisonment of not less than six months for the first offense. The parent will also be required to pay the unpaid legal children support fees. The fill is increased to P50,000 or imprisonment of not less than one but not more than two years. The total unpaid amount of legal child support fees will also be settled. While the bill is still pending in congress, parents will rely on the current law in the meantime.

"Art. 194. Support comprises everything indispensable for sustenance, dwelling, clothing, medical attendance, education and transportation, in keeping with the financial capacity of the family.

The education of the person entitled to be supported referred to in the preceding paragraph shall include his schooling or training for some profession, trade or vocation, even beyond the age of majority. Transportation shall include expenses in going to and from school, or to and from place of work.

Art. 201. The amount of support, in the cases referred to in Articles 195 and 196, shall be in proportion to the resources or means of the giver and to the necessities of the recipient.

Art. 202. Support in the cases referred to in the preceding article shall be reduced or increased proportionately, according to the reduction or increase of the necessities of the recipient and the resources or means of the person obliged to furnish the same. "

Many women cry(or even die) in silence and the bruises all over their body are tell tale signs of domestic abuse. According to the Center for Women's Resources (CWR), from year 2010 and 2014, the violations of the Anti-Violence Against Women and Children Act increased by 200 percent.  In a country where male dominance is still considered part of the culture, some women remain submissive despite the pain they have to endure. Victims of domestic violence continue to be in chains because of giving importance to the sanctity of marriage. Women who are abused also stay for the sake of their children, but the trauma continues as children would sometimes witness the physical and emotional torture being inflicted upon the mother. In fact, children are not spared from violence because their frail body is also used as punching bag when the father has temper tantrums. Unfortunately, violence is not limited to physical abuse. So, what are considered acts of violence against women and their women.

SEC. 5. Acts of violence against women and their children under R.A. No. 9262.—Violence against women and their children is committed through any of the following acts:

(a)            Causing, threatening or attempting to cause physical harm to the woman or her child;

(b)            Placing the woman or her child in fear of imminent physical harm;

(c)            Attempting to compel or compelling the woman or her child to engage in conduct which the woman or her child has the right to desist from or to desist from conduct which the woman or her child has the right to engage in, or attempting to restrict .or restricting the woman’s or her child’s freedom of movement or conduct by force or threat of force, physical or other harm or threat of physical on other harm, or intimidation directed against the woman or her child.

This shall include, but is not limited to, the following acts committed with the purpose or effect of controlling or restricting the movement or conduct of the woman or her child:

(1)     Threatening to deprive or actually depriving the woman or her child of custody or access to her/his family;

(2)     Depriving or threatening to deprive the woman or her children of financial support legally due her or her family, or deliberately providing the woman’s children insufficient financial support;

(3)     Depriving or threatening to deprive the woman or her child of a legal right; and

(4)     Preventing the woman from engaging in any legitimate profession, occupation, business or activity except in cases where the spouse or partner on valid, serious  and moral grounds, or controlling the victim’s own money or property, or solely controlling the conjugal or common money or property;

(d)            Inflicting or threatening to inflict physical ham on oneself for the purpose of controlling her actions or decisions;

(e)            Causing or attempting to cause the woman or her child to engage in any sexual activity which does not constitute rape, by force or threat of force, physical harm, or through intimidation directed against the woman   or her child or her/his immediate family;

(f)             Engaging in purposeful, knowing, or reckless conduct, personally or through another, that alarms or causes substantial emotional or psychological distress to the woman or her child.

This shall include, but is not limited to, the following acts:

(1)     Stalking or following the woman or her child in public or private places;

(2)     Peering in the window or lingering outside the residence of the woman or her child;

(3)     Entering or remaining in the dwelling or on the property of the woman or her child against her/his will;

(4)     Destroying the property and personal belongings or inflicting harm to animals or pets of the woman or child; and

(5)     Engaging in any form of harassment or violence; or

(g)            Causing mental or emotional anguish, public ridicule or humiliation to the woman or her child, including, but not limited to, repeated verbal and emotional abuse, and denial of financial support or custody of a minor child or denial of access to the woman’s child.

The key to the success of renting out your property is ensuring that you keep your tenants happy. However, this rule does not only apply to landlords as tenants also have their own responsibilities. More often than not, tenants and landlords end up dealing with complaints and problems because there was no complete closure of the responsibilities each party needs to fulfill.

Dos (Landlords)

-Screen your tenants
It is not enough that your tenants have the ability to pay the rent because there are also other factors that you need to take into consideration. Incurring damages to your property is often inevitable. This is where comparing good apples to bad apples come into play. Make sure you pick the best tenant by putting them through a series of interviews as part of the screening process.

-Ensure tenant's safety
It is your responsibility as a landlord to ensure that your property is a livable and safe place. Make sure you check anything for repairs. If there are fixtures in need of attention, consider having a maintenance schedule. Electrical and gas equipment must be regularly checked by trusted technicians.

-Respect tenants' privacy
Tenants should enjoy their privacy even when they are renting your property. If you need to inspect the property, be sure to schedule your visits. You can freak your tenants out if you show up in the wee hours of the morning for inspection. Tenants surely appreciate if landlords value their privacy.

-Prepare a contract
Verbal agreements may appear to be the easiest way to bind a tenant into a commitment. However, if problems arise, both parties will be in a no-win situation. Even if the occupant is a friend or an acquaintance, it still pays to prepare a lease contract that is notarized as much as possible. Both parties will be protected when there is a written contract.

Don'ts (Landlords)

-Overcharge
Renting out your place is such a big step to make, but this should not be used as an excuse for overcharging tenants. Be sure to learn about the rental market so you will know the reasonable price range. You will have difficulties finding a lessee if you attempt to overcharge. The rate must be reasonable for both parties.

-Forget about the rent due date
Non-paying tenants have always been the bane of every landlord's existence. This is why you need to encourage them to pay their rent on time. You need to be stern but respectful at the same time. While it can be frustrating to deal with tenants who always fail to make timely payments, you should avoid nagging them.

-Ignore problems with the property
If a landlord is employed full-time, it is easy to slack off in maintenance. It is necessary that you check your property from time to time to know if it needs improvement. If your tenants are making timely payments, they also deserve to live in a safe and problem-free place.

Dos (Tenants)

-Inspect the property

There might be some instances that you prefer to do your transactions online and searching for a property or place to rent is no exception. While the place may look nice in the picture, nothing beats inspecting the property in person to know whether or not you are getting a good deal.

-Read and sign a contract
A written contract protects you from any disputes due to not fulfilling the agreements that the landlord has promised. If you have a contract both parties will know if the conditions have been performed. Never sign a contract without reading the terms and conditions thoroughly. Ask questions if there is something in the contract you need to clarify.

-Pay on time
Rent payment is used for maintenance or paying the utility bills. Delayed payments may also result in a series of inconveniences ranging from lack of electricity, water supply, interrupted internet connectivity and many others.

Don'ts (Tenants)

-Damage the property
As a tenant, it is your responsibility to take care of the landlord's property you rented. In the event of property damage, you should make it a point to shoulder the cost for repair or maintenance.

-Violate lease contract agreement
Once you have signed the contract, it is an indicator that you have agreed to its terms and conditions. If you violate any of the agreements, the landlord has the right to evict you. Make sure you follow rules including making timely payments.

It seems so easy to pick on someone via social media because of the freedom to remain anonymous. Cyber-bullying has been plaguing people because of the damage it causes that are sometimes beyond repair. There are quite a few examples of cyber-bullying taken to extremes. Just recently, A woman was doing the rounds on the Internet because of ranting about a man whom he perceived to be "ungentleman" for failing to offer a seat during an MRT ride. Her comments went a little too personal that it earned the ire of netizens. Cyber-bullying did not end with just an exchange of derogatory remarks because the ones who criticized the woman were also doing the same thing.

What acts considered as cyber-bullying?

"a) Repeatedly sending offensive, rude and insulting message;

b) Distributing derogatory information about the victim;

c) Posting or sending offensive photos of the victim, whether these are digitally altered or not, or were taken with or without consent, with the intention to humiliate and embarrass the victim;

d) Breaking into an email, social networking or any electronic account and using the victim’s virtual identity to send, upload or distribute embarrassing materials to or about others;

e) Sharing the victim’s personal information or any embarrassing information, or tricking the victim into revealing personal or embarrassing information and sharing it to others; and

f) Repeatedly sending messages that include threats of harm or engaging in online activities that cause fear on the victim’s safety."

What to do about cyber-bullying?

1. Take a screenshot of the hateful messages and save it.
2. Be sure to inform your loved ones about the attacks you receive.
3. Inform the authorities about the attacks.
4. If the bully uses social accounts, report the account being used.
5. Change your mobile number if these are also being used for the attacks.
6. Deactivate your account and try to avoid going online for a time being. Online aggression from the bully can be monitored by your friends or family.
7. Seek professional counseling.
8. Seek police help.

Things may not always go your way, but this does not mean that you should use social media as an avenue for expressions. Be sure to think twice before posting anything to social media because not everyone understands. Remember that photos speak volumes and anyone can be a storyteller. Everyone can have a bad day, but instead of using Facebook and other social accounts to vent out, talk to your friends and loved ones. It saves you from bullying and being bullied plus you get advice from real people.

Mr. X used to have a great job abroad but he was sent home by his employer as part of the company's cost-cutting measures. Mr. X was able to sustain months without a job, thanks to the small savings he was able to secure while working abroad. However, it did not take long for him to find himself trying to make ends meet. He still had 4 mouths to feed and two of which are already in college. Mr. X was in dire need of a job to put food on their plate and to support his children's education. There were jobs that match his skills, but he always falls short on one thing: his age. He always goes home with a heavy heart because despite his qualifications, employers still prefer younger applicants. Mr. X loses hope.

This scenario is very common in a country where age really matters in employment. There are many workers who fit the bill, but once they come across a job ad with age requirement, their hopes vanish into thin air. With the Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Law, the not-so-young applicants will have a chance at getting the job without worrying about age limit.

Republic Act 10911: Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Law

This law covers all labor contractors, subcontractors, employers, labor organizations, and publishers. For employers, any ad, printed or published, which suggests limitations, preferences, discrimination, and specifications based on age will not be allowed. In addition, employers should not decline any employment application due to the person's age. Employees must also have the privilege to get promoted or trained for advancement despite their age. Employers should not let go of employees or workers because of old age. Imposing early retirement because of age is also a prohibited employment practice.

Age Limitation Exception

• Bona fide seniority system
• Bona fide employee retirement or a voluntary early retirement plan
• Age is a bona fide occupational qualification

Penalties

The penalties for the violation of this law include a fine of P50,000.00 but not more than P500,000.00 and imprisonment of not less than 3 months but more than 2 years. The penalty will be imposed the guilty officer or officer if the offense is committed by a corporation.

The Anti-Age Discrimination Bill will be implemented by the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE). They shall have the authority to investigate and require the records for the administration of the Act. The implementing Rules and Regulations will be formulated by the Secretary of Labor and Employment within 90 days from the law's effectivity.

While you may try to do everything to ensure renting out your property runs smoothly, there are still instances when you need to deal with a non-paying tenant. There might be other grounds for tenant eviction, but non-payment is the most common. Some prefer to create a verbal agreement while others secure a contract. With or without a contract, a tenant who fails to pay for a maximum of three months can be subject for ejectment. However, things are always easier said than done. Here's what you need to know about ejectment:

Grounds and process of ejectment

"Sec.  5.  Grounds for Judicial Ejectment. — Ejectment shall be allowed on the following grounds:

    a.  Subleasing or assignment of lease of residential units in whole or in part, without the written consent of the owner/lessor: Provided, That in case of subleases or assignments executed prior to the approval of this Act, the sublessor/assignor shall have sixty days from the effectivity of this Act within which to obtain the written approval of the owner/lessor or terminate the sublease or assignment.

    b.  Arrears in payment of rent for three (3) months at any one time: Provided, That in case of refusal by the lessor to accept payment of the rental agreed upon, the lessee shall either deposit, by way of consignation, the amount in court, or in a bank in the name of and with notice to the lessor.

    c.  Need of owner/lessor to repossess his property for his own use for the use of any immediate member of his family as a residential unit, such owner or immediate member not being the owner of any other available residential unit: Provided, however, That the period of lease has expired: Provided, further, That the lessor has given the lessee notice three months in advance of the lessor's intention to repossess the property: and Provided, finally, That the owner/lessor or immediate member stays in the residential unit for at least one year, except for justifiable cause.

    d.  Ownership by the lessee of another residential unit which he may use as his residence: Provided, That the lessee shall have been notified by the lessor of the intended ejectment three months in advance.

    e.  Need of the lessor to make necessary repairs of the leased premises which is the subject of an existing order of condemnation by the appropriate administrative authorities concerned in order to make the said premises safe and habitable: Provided, That after said repair, the lessee ejected shall have the right of first refusal of the lease of the same premises.

    f.  Expiration of the period of a written lease contract. "

When you buy something from a store and the cashier or the store owner owes you a few cents, would you take the change given in the form of a candy? To some, a few cents are not that big of a deal, but shortchanging is considered a violation of the law. Perhaps you have also encountered a cashier from a business establishment asking you for a smaller bill, some will immediately search their pockets for some loose coins while others will give the cashier a questioning glance?

If you are in a hurry, you will simply leave an impression of indifference, take the change available to the cashier and forget about the missing cents. Customers who do not have the luxury of time to argue will not be too concerned with getting the exact change. However, with the Republic Act 10909 gaining traction in the Philippine law, shortchanging should be a big no-no. 

No Shortchanging Act

The law will not exempt establishments lacking loose coins or bills. Exact change must be given to the customer. There are also conditions when establishments are encouraged to provide excess change to ensure that the change given to the customer is not less than the amount due. Other alternatives such as giving candies will not be allowed in exchange to loose change. The amount may be small, but this should not be a reason for the customers to allow managers and staff to be spared from giving the exact change regardless of the amount.

The Penalties

If establishments fail to give the exact change to customers, a fine of P500 will be imposed for the first offense. For the second violation, there will be a suspension of business' license for 3 months and an additional fine of P25,000 will be imposed. For the third offense, the license to operate will be revoked and an additional fine of P25,000 will be imposed. The law applies to big and small establishments, even sari-sari stores. In case you purchase something, make sure you demand for exact change.

Your name serves as a weapon of identification, but it can be a bane of one's existence if the surname sounds funny or change. Perhaps you were one of those people making fun of your classmate's surname when you were in grade school or you were one of the hapless victims of bullying because you were not "blessed" with a nice sounding surname. There is nothing new to this scenario. In fact, people who hear funny names will instantly laugh just because. Well, you do not have to endure the problem with your surname because you now have the option to change it.

Changing surnames is now covered by the Rules of Court of the Philippines Special Proceedings. However, you need to file a petition at the Court of First Instance. You should also have valid reasons for changing your name. For instance, if you are changing your name because it has been a subject to ridicule, you need to substantiate the claims. Having a witness is also encouraged when filing a petition as this reduces the chance of the petition being denied. The reason to change your name is also highlighted under Section 4 of the Republic Act No. 9048.

" SECTION 4. Grounds for Change of First Name or Nickname. - The petition for change of first name or nickname may be allowed in any of the following cases:

1. The petitioner finds the first name or nickname to be ridiculous, tainted with dishonor or extremely difficult to write or pronounce.
2. The new first name or nickname has been habitually and continuously used by the petitioner and he has been publicly known by that by that first name or nickname in the community: or
3. The change will avoid confusion."

Rule 103 (Change of Name)

"A person can effect a change of name under Rule 103 (CHANGE OF NAME) using valid and meritorious grounds including (a) when the name is ridiculous, dishonorable or extremely difficult to write or pronounce; (b) when the change results as a legal consequence such as legitimation; (c) when the change will avoid confusion; (d) when one has continuously used and been known since childhood by a Filipino name, and was unaware of alien parentage; (e) a sincere desire to adopt a Filipino name to erase signs of former alienage, all in good faith and without prejudicing anybody; and (f) when the surname causes embarrassment and there is no showing that the desired  change  of name was for a fraudulent purpose or that the change of name would prejudice public interest.[17]  Respondent’s reason for changing his name cannot be considered as one of, or analogous to, recognized grounds, however."

With the growing number of unemployed individuals in the Philippines, employment is deemed a privilege. A privilege that some employers tend to exploit due to the employee's lack of basic knowledge of the labor law. Some employees are well aware of their rights and exercise it when they feel that employers are already crossing the lines. There are employees that remain oblivious to the fact that they are giving more to the employers and only getting less. Part-time employment may seem less glamorous than its counterpart: the full-time employment. However, it does not necessarily mean that this type of employment will not entitle employees of the benefits they so deserve. DOLE's explanatory bulletin explains the right of a part-time employee:

On payment of wages and statutory monetary benefits

As the Labor Code benefits are generally based on the 8-hour workday schedule, the employer may pay “proportionately decrease the daily wage and wage-related benefits granted by law.” This presupposes that there is no contrary stipulation in the employment contract, company policy, CBA, requiring full payment for 8 hours a day despite a shorter work schedule.

The above rule applies the principle of fairness and equity, as well as the principle of “a fair day’s wage for a fair day’s labor.”
On security of tenure

Part-time employees enjoy security of tenure.

As with full-time employees, part-time employees may only be terminated from employment after observance of due process. Due process termination requires the observance of substantive due process and procedural due process. Non-compliance with due process will result in illegal dismissal of a part-time employee.

Curiously, the Bulletin states that part-time employees are entitled to security of tenure only if they become regular employees. “Once they become regular employees, they are entitled to security of tenure under the law, and can only be separated for a just or authorized cause and after due process.”

It is respectfully submitted that this is incorrect.

The principle of security of tenure enshrined in the 1987 Constitution applies to all employees – without exception. As a part-time employee is undoubtedly and without question an employee, then the principle of security of tenure likewise applies to such employee.

Further, it should be borne in mind that a part-time employee may be a regular despite the shorter working schedule. To be clear, a regular employee may be a full-time regular or a part-time regular. The Supreme Court no less has recognized such a situation.

In Perpetual Help Cooperative, Inc. v. Faburada, it was held that a part-time employee may be a regular despite rendering less than the eight hours of work a day. “That [the employee] worked only on a part-time basis does not mean that he is a not a regular employee. Ones regularity of employment is not determined by the number of hours one works but by the nature and by the length of time one has been in that particular job.”

As the Bulletin was issued in 1996 and the Perpetual Help Cooperative case was promulgated in 2005, it is submitted that the said case law supersedes the Bulletin insofar as there may be inconsistencies.
On probationary employment

In the Bulletin, probationary employment for part-time employees may extend the prescribed six (6) months period to the extent that the total number of hours work would be equal to that of a full-time employee under probation.

The justification is anchored on the “intent of the law in allowing a probationary period prior to regularization.”[6] The employer’s main reason for insisting the 6-month probation is to test the employee’s fitness for employment during that time. Thus, the number of normal working days and hours within the probationary period should be observed. “For this reason, part-timers should become regular in status, after working for the total number of hours or days, which completes a six-month probationary period of a full-time worker in the same establishment doing the same job under normal circumstances.”